Legal Opinion

Twin Lakes Reservoir & Canal Co. v. Bond

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 5, 1965No. 20777PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

We will refer to The Twin Lakes Reservoir and Canal Company as Twin Lakes in those instances in which the reference is to the company as distinguished from the other plaintiffs in error. Where all plaintiffs in error are equally affected they will be referred to as the defendants. The defendant in error will be referred to as the plaintiff or as Bond.

*12The action was commenced in the trial court by Bond who sought to partition certain real estate in eight sections of land in Lake County, Colorado. The case involves a substantial acreage lying under two natural lakes commonly known as Twin…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Johnson v. NeelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  3. Smith v. WilkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Piz v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  5. Martin v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Prude v. LewisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Braaten v. BraatenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bolz v. Security Mutual Life Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Beach v. BeachColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Cox v. LasleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API