Legal Opinion
Piz v. Housing Authority
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided November 7, 1955No. 17433PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss
In the trial court the defendant in error, Denver Housing Authority, was plaintiff, and plaintiff in error Piz was defendant in an eminent domain proceeding wherein the Housing Authority sought to condemn the Piz property as part of a vast, low cost housing project. After trial and a verdict, fixing the value of the Piz property, the trial court on motion of the Housing Authority dismissed the action over the objection of counsel for Piz. Piz brings the cause here on writ of error.
The undisputed facts as disclosed by this record are: In the year 1951 the Housing Authority of the City and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wilson v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Times-Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Los Angeles v. KlinkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- City of L.A. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Johnson v. NeelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority v. Cornerstone Group XXII, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- City and County of Denver v. StackhouseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Crawford v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Jafay v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- First National Bank of Denver v. UlibarriColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.