Legal Opinion
Chapman v. Special School District No. 1
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 11, 1990No. C2-89-979, C1-89-1007PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
We granted the separate petitions of Gerald Grady and Special School District No. 1 to clarify the applicability and procedural limitations of Minn.R.Civ.P. 60.02 and its subparts in the context of the trial court’s vacation of a judgment of dismissal of the plaintiff’s action. In a split, but unpublished decision, a majority of the court of appeals affirmed, concluding that the motion to vacate was timely and that relief was available pursuant to Rule 60.-02(f). We reverse.
Rachael Rouse, a minor, commenced this action in early 1984 to recover damages occasioned by alleged…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Finden v. KlaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Sommers v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Conley v. DowningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gassler v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Dain Bosworth Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Majestic Inc. v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Kern v. JansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In re Commitment of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.