In re Commitment of Johnson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtLarkin, Judge
In 2012, appellant was committed as a sexually dangerous person (SDP) and as a sexual psychopathic personality (SPP). In 2018, appellant moved for a new trial and asked the district court to appoint an attorney to represent him in the proceedings on his motion. As support for his motion, appellant asserted that his court-appointed attorney in the commitment proceedings was under the influence of a mood-altering substance and provided ineffective assistance of counsel as a result. The district court denied appellant's request for court-appointed counsel, as well as his motion for a new trial.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Gates v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Opsahl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. RhodesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Finden v. KlaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Edward Everett UrbanekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
- In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Peter Allan aka Peter Allan GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025