Legal Opinion

In re Lobl

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 21, 1955No. 6163PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWoelet, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of claims 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7, the only claims remaining in appellant’s application, No. 169,228, for a patent on a container and closure therefor. Claims 1, 2, and 4 are typical of the appealed claims and read:

1. A container comprising a wall portion having a fill opening therein, a removable and replaceable closure for said opening, comprising a suction cup made of resilient flexible material having a convex side and a concave side, a relatively short…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re StacyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  2. In re DaweCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  3. In re WaldronCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
  4. In re WolfeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Application of Marvin C. Van Wanderham, Warren W. Worthley and Carl R. ComolliCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  2. Application of James H. ShapleighCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  3. In re ShapleighCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  4. Application of James A. UmbargerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  5. Application of Boyd J. Sevold, of the Estate of Alexander D. Jidich, Also Known as Alexander Djidics, DeceasedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API