Legal Opinion
Application of James A. Umbarger
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 6, 1969No. Patent Appeal 8098PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of the only remaining claims, numbered 31 through 42, in appellant’s application entitled “Ignition Analyzing Tachometer Including Ferrite Inductive Connector Means.” 1
The invention relates to a tachometer for operation from the ignition system of an internal combustion engine to indicate engine speed. One embodiment of the device is illustrated in Fig. 1:
The illustrated apparatus is adapted for use with an internal combustion engine wherein an electrical conductor 4 connects one of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Application of Ferdinand J. RattiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- In re LoblCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re MouttetCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Michael--Regan Co., Inc., a California Corporation v. Martin Lindell, a Sole Proprietor Doing Business Under the Firm Name of Lindell Enterprises, and Third-Party v. Dahlkey, Inc., a Washington Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975