Legal Opinion

Besuner v. Faberge, Incorporated

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 7, 1974No. C74-7PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

BEN C. GREEN, District Judge:

This action is brought as an appeal from a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent Office, denying to plaintiff registration of the trademark “Fabrece”. That registration had been opposed in the Patent Office by defendant, Faberge, Inc.

Summons was originally served by personal service upon a representative of the defendant at defendant’s office in New York City. That service was quashed, as not being in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules. Plaintiff thereafter reissued service against defendant by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. North American Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  2. The Barr Rubber Products Company v. Burlington Mills, Inc., and David L. Ladd, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  3. Diva Laboratorium Aktienge-Sellschaft v. DeLoney & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1965

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Myers v. American Dental AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  2. Bacik v. PeekDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993
  3. Finance Co. of America v. BankAmerica Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1980
  4. Lubrizol Corp. v. Neville Chemical Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1978
  5. Scotch Whisky Ass'n v. Majestic Distilling Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API