Legal Opinion
Bacik v. Peek
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 14, 1993No. 1:93 CV 0312PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SAM H. BELL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Currently before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss or in the alternative, to transfer the above captioned matter, Docket #4. The plaintiffs have responded to this motion, to which defendants have replied. As is necessary with motions of this sort, we begin with a summary of plaintiffs’ complaint.
The complaint, removed from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, is brought by Ohio citizens Brian Baeik and Emil Baeik. The defendants are Gregory Peek, Michael Peek, Clayton Harris and the Safety & Performance Systems Corporation, all…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Pt United Can Company Ltd. v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., F/k/a Continental Can Company Richard Krzyzanowski John W. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Zimmer Enterprises, Inc. v. Atlandia Imports, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- Picker International, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
- Three M Enterprises, Inc. v. Texas D.A.R. Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- United States v. Cinemark USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.