Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 2000No. 1999-1866PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 113.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WALLACE. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace,

2000-Ohio-120.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Six-month suspension—Engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation. (No. 99-1866—Submitted January 12, 2000—Decided May 31, 2000.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 98-51. __________________ {¶ 1} In July 1992, Crestline Building & Loan Association, the mortgage holder, purchased a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API