Legal Opinion

In re Reichert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, Second Department, on February 5, 1960, and maintains an office for the practice of law in Rochester. The Grievance Committee filed a petition charging respondent with neglect*6ing legal matters entrusted to him and with failing to comply with the attorney registration requirements found in Judiciary Law § 468-a. Respondent submitted an answer denying material allegations in the petition and setting forth matters in mitigation. A Referee was appointed to conduct a hearing on the issues of fact raised by the…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re BridgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. In re HahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. In re McLeodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. In re HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. In re HolmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re HuyckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. In re DuffyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. In re ReichertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API