Legal Opinion

In re Holm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this *49court on April 2, 1969 and maintains an office in Fayetteville. By petition dated January 24, 1991, the Grievance Committee of the Fifth Judicial District charged him with violating several provisions of the Code of Professional Responsibility.

Respondent’s answer raised issues of fact that required the appointment of a Referee to take proof with regard to the charges and to report his findings to this court. We confirm the findings of fact in the Referee’s report and conclude that respondent is guilty of violating…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re SchunkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. In re CorbettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. In re McLeodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re ReichertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. In re HuyckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API