In re Huyck
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Divi*89sion, Third Department, on February 20, 1973 and maintains an office for the practice of law in the Village of Herkimer. Petitioner charged respondent with neglecting legal matters entrusted to him and with failing to cooperate with petitioner’s investigation. Following the appointment of a Referee, the parties executed a stipulation resolving outstanding issues of fact and the Referee adopted the stipulation as his findings of fact.
We confirm the findings of fact and conclude that respondent violated the following…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- In re ReichertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re McLeodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re HolmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
4Cited by2 opinions
- In re DuffyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006