Legal Opinion

In re Huyck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Divi*89sion, Third Department, on February 20, 1973 and maintains an office for the practice of law in the Village of Herkimer. Petitioner charged respondent with neglecting legal matters entrusted to him and with failing to cooperate with petitioner’s investigation. Following the appointment of a Referee, the parties executed a stipulation resolving outstanding issues of fact and the Referee adopted the stipulation as his findings of fact.

We confirm the findings of fact and conclude that respondent violated the following…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re ReichertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. In re McLeodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. In re HolmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re DuffyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API