Legal Opinion
Affiliated FM Insurance v. LTK Consulting Services Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 17, 2009No. 07-35696PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER CERTIFYING QUESTION TO WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT
RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
We respectfully ask the Washington State Supreme Court to answer the certified question presented below, pursuant to Revised Code of Washington § 2.60.020, because “it is necessary to ascertain the local law of [Washington] state in order to dispose of [this] proceeding and the local law has not been clearly determined.” This case involves a tort claim under Washington law for approximately $3 million in damages to the Monorail System— the elevated train system located in downtown Seattle —…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Berschauer/Phillips Construction Co. v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Alejandre v. BullWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Gary Dean Broad Denise Broad, Husband and Wife v. Mannesmann Anlagenbau AgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
3Cited by22 opinions
- AFFILIATED FM v. LTK Consulting ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Affiliated FM Insurance v. LTK Consulting Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2010
- Affiliated FM Insurance v. LTK Consulting Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
- Donatelli v. D.R. Strong Consulting Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Affiliated FM Insurance v. LTK Consulting Services Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.