Legal Opinion
Barbrick v. White Sewing Machine Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 1, 1914No. Docket No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error to Kent; McDonald, J. Trover in justice’s court by William Barbrick against the White Sewing Machine Company for conversion of a sewing machine. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appealed to the circuit court in which judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This suit is in trover. It was brought in justice’s court to recover the value of a sewing machine. The plaintiff recovered a judgment for $30. The case was appealed by defendant to the circuit court, where plaintiff again recovered a judgment of $30. The case is brought here by writ of error.
Counsel for appellant say, we quote from the brief:
“There are no intricate questions of law involved in this case. It seems to us that all the questions involved and upon which error is assigned are too elementary to admit of discussion, and counsel desire to say at the outset that, but for the fact that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sisson v. Cleveland & Toledo RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Kermott v. AyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Smith v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Comstock v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Dalton v. LaudahnMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aufderheide v. FulkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Kimball v. BettsWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Ehman v. Libralter Plastics, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Engel v. TateMichigan Supreme Court · 1918