Hensley v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Associate Judge:
Petitioner Horace Hensley, who has received worker’s compensation benefits based on total disability since the late 1980’s, sought an additional award requiring his former employer, intervenor Chee-chi & Company (the “Employer”), to reimburse his expenses for certain medical, assisted-living, transportation, home at*1198tendant, and other services, all of which petitioner claims relate to workplace aggravation (in 1986) of the progressive disease that affects his joints. Petitioner also sought an order establishing his entitlement to payment of a 20% penalty as a result…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Home Box Office, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Professional Baseball, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Marmolejo-Campos v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- INDIRA POOLA v. HOWARD UNIVERSITYDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Jerome Bradley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Mirna Placido v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and Compass Group USA, Inc. and Gallagher Bassett ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- JOSE RODRIGUEZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Rayburn L. Levy v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.