Farver v. Department of Retirement Systems
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.
Phyllis and John Berling (petitioner) were married in 1944. In 1974 John petitioned for dissolution. At the time of trial, John had worked for the Washington State Patrol for 22 years and his contingent pension rights in the Washington State Patrol's retirement system constituted the most valuable marital asset.
The trial court, in the process of allocating the marital property, divided the retirement rights, giving three-fourths of the income from the contingent pension to John and one-fourth to Phyllis, with the unchallenged proviso that any additional benefits accruing in the event John…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Benson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Waite v. WaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Wilder v. WilderWashington Supreme Court · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dean v. LehmanWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- In re the Marriage of MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Marriage of MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Navlet v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Arnold v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.