Legal Opinion

State v. Schaeffer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 15, 1990No. C9-89-1109PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

The court of appeals granted defendant a new trial on a charge of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree on the ground that the trial court, while properly admitting defendant’s confession, prejudicially erred by permitting defendant’s trial counsel to elicit evidence that police used the results of a polygraph test to get defendant to confess, evidence defense counsel hoped would persuade the jury to discredit the confession. State v. Schaeffer, 452 N.W.2d 719 (Minn.App.1990). We conclude, however, that the trial court did not err and accordingly reverse the court of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Wyrick v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. JungbauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. MelockIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. RileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. State v. WiernaszSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Rogers v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. AltCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API