Legal Opinion

State v. Jungbauer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 1984No. C8-83-102PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, Justice.

Defendant was charged in district court with theft of over $2,500, Minn.Stat. § 609.-52, subds. 2(1), 3(1) (1982). The main evidence against defendant was his confession to police that he took the property in a burglary. After the omnibus court denied the motion to suppress this confession, defendant waived his right to a trial by jury and agreed to let the trial court decide his guilt on the basis of stipulated facts. 1 The court found defendant guilty and stayed imposition of sentence, placed defendant on probation for 5 years, and stayed the conditions of probation…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lynumn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. People v. StegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. United States v. Paul FerraraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  5. People v. KendrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. PilcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. State v. SlowinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. State v. RittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. State v. ThaggardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. State v. WiernaszSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API