State v. Oredson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Ensign, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a trial and conviction of the crime of practicing medicine without a license.
1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.
The defendant was indicted by the grand jury of St. Louis county “of the crime of practicing medicine in the state of Minnesota without first having obtained a license.” The indictment set out this general charge, and specified that on a given day, in the city of Duluth, St. Louis county, Minnesota, the defendant publicly professed to be a physician, and then and there for a named fee prescribed drugs and medicine for the use and medical treatment of a person for a disease of which she then and there complained and was suffering. The case was tried by a jury, which found the defendant guilty.…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Reeves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Shenk v. State Board of ExaminersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- State v. RolphSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- State v. CrombieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- State v. CrombieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.