Legal Opinion

Technology Properties Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 11, 2015No. Case No. 3:12-cv-03877-VC, Case No. 3:12-cv-03880-VCPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART MOTIONS TO STRIKE AND DENYING MOTIONS TO COMPEL

PAUL S. GREWAL, United States Magistrate Judge

In each of these two related cases, Defendants move to strike Plaintiffs’ infringement contentions1 and Plaintiffs move to compel Defendants to produce discovery arising from those contentions.2 At issue is whether Plaintiffs’ contentions meet the requirements of Patent L.R. 3-1 and whether Plaintiffs properly accuse “instru-mentalities” — Patent Local Rules-speak for products — that were never made, sold, used or imported, or released before the expiration of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Microsoft Corp. v. At&t Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. View Engineering, Inc. v. Robotic Vision Systems, Inc., and Morrison Law FirmCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  3. Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  4. Shared Memory Graphics LLC v. Apple, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2010

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. ATX Networks (Toronto) Corp. v. Technetix, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2025
  2. Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2025
  3. FaceTec, Inc. v. iProov Ltd.District Court, D. Nevada · 2024
  4. FaceTec, Inc. v. iProov Ltd.District Court, D. Nevada · 2024
  5. National Products Inc v. Innovative Intelligent Products LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API