Legal Opinion

Shinn Irrigation Equipment, Inc. v. Marchand

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 12, 1969No. 14-40094-3PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, C. J.

This is an action for debt based upon an open account. In its complaint plaintiff alleged that the defendants were indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $2,286.87 for material and labor sold and delivered to the defendants, and said sum was due and unpaid. The defendants answered by a general denial and pleaded no affirmative defense.

The case went to trial upon the issues so raised. Plaintiff presented evidence that the charges involved, covering the period between May 1, 1965 and December 15, .1966, were for material and labor furnished at defendants’ request, and those charges were due…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bernard v. U. S. AircoachDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  2. Lopez v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1955
  3. Kirby v. Turner-Day & Woolworth Handle Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1943
  4. Morse v. McGradyWashington Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harting v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. Harting v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Locke v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Mukilteo Retirement Apartments, LLC v. Mukilteo Investors LPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Thomas v. M---R---AMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API