In re the Recall of Carkeek
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Robert Carkeek is a commissioner of Drainage Improvement District No. 8. Shortly after he unsuccessfully sought an antiharassment order that would have excluded two of his neighbors from drainage commission district meetings, a recall petition was filed against him. The trial judge found all but one of the many charges factually or legally insufficient, rewrote the only surviving charge, and approved that charge “as revised.”
Chambers, J.
¶2 We find the allegation that Commissioner Carkeek committed misfeasance, malfeasance, or violation of the oath of office unsupported by the record. We…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chandler v. OttoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re the Recall of WadeWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- In re the Recall of AckersonWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- In re the Recall of EastWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re AckersonWashington Supreme Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re the Recall of BoldtWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- In Re Recall of TelfordWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- In re the Recall of TelfordWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- In re Recall of InsleeWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- In re the Recall Charges Against Seattle School District No. 1 Director Butler-WallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.