Legal Opinion
Edward Rose Co. v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 29, 1928PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action on a policy insuring cotton waste belonging to the plaintiff “against losses caused by fire . . . from the time the property insured passes into the custody of any common carrier . . . until delivered by common carrier at destination.” The plaintiff had a contract for the entire product of manufactured cotton waste at a mill in Georgia, from which a carload was frequently shipped. It was undisputed that three different shipments of cotton waste belonging to the plaintiff were destroyed by fire while in the custody of a common carrier, and that the plaintiff would be entitled…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Bigwood v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Koshland v. Columbia InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Thornhill v. Carpenter-Morton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- New England Gas & Electric Ass'n v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Robitaille v. Netoco Community Theatre of North Attleboro, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Kosior v. Continental Insurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Simmons v. Monarch MacHine Tool Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Ouillette v. SheerinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.