Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Monarch MacHine Tool Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 22, 1992PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, C.J.

On March 30, 1983, the plaintiff, William Simmons, a machine operator employed by the Raytheon Company, was injured when a tool known as a “tap” ejected from a tool assembly (toolholder) and penetrated his left eye. The circumstances of the accident were as follows. Simmons had been operating a vertical milling machine known as a VMC 150 when he noticed that the cutting tool (tap) in the machine’s toolholder had become dull and needed replacement. Simmons removed the toolholder from the VMC 150 and, with the intention of changing the tap, secured the tool-holder in a bench vise designed for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Back v. Wickes Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Raunela v. Hertz Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. Correia v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Smith v. Ariens Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Uloth v. City Tank Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,686 Mary Hayes, Administrator of the Estate of Robert Hayes, Jr., and Eric Hayes v. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Vassallo v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Joanne Kotler, Individually and as Administratrix, Etc. v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. Donovan v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  5. Bergendahl v. Massachusetts Electric Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API