Legal Opinion
Byrne v. Metcalfe Const. Co.
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided September 10, 1951No. Civ. No. 68-46PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOHOE, Chief Judge.
This action was .instituted by Cyril J. Byrne, James W. Tillery, Fritz Moline, Robert W. Metzler and Arthur J. Dergan against the Metcalfe Construction Company, the Hamilton Construction Company and the Kansas City Bridge Company, joint adventurers in the performance of a Government construction contract, to recover compensation for overtime under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 207. The parties have entered. into a comprehensive stipulation which adequately sets forth the facts material to their dispute. The court accepts…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Vermilya-Brown Co. v. ConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Postow v. Oba Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Daves v. Hawaiian Dredging Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1953
- Fruco Const. Co. v. McClellandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Elliot Postow and Joan L. Postow v. Oba Federal Savings and Loan Association, Elliot Postow and Joan L. Postow v. Oba Federal Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980