Spinning v. Sullivan
Michigan Supreme Court
.Appeal from the Superior Court of Detroit. Bill to correct note. Complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.
This is a family dispute. Complainant and defendant Timothy are sons-in-law of defendant James. A full history of all the incidents is needless. The main, circumstances are as follows:
In November, 1871, tip defendant James conveyed sixty acres of land to complainant and in order to secure payment of the purchase price, $3170, the latter executed his note- and mortgage to his father-in-law therefor. The papers were dated November 8th. Several payments were made and a portion were endorsed on the note and some others on the mortgage, but a large amount was not endorsed on-either.
In March, 1878,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Myers v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Trust Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Aniba v. YeomansMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Lancaster National Bank v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Hedges v. SealyNew York Supreme Court · 1850
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vickery v. BurtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Gale v. MayhewMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- First National Bank v. HenryIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Davis v. MerrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1883