Legal Opinion

Davis v. Merrill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

The defendants were copartners on the 14th of October, 1874, and had been for sometime previous thereto, and as such the company on that day gave to the defendant Eastwood, a note due in one month after date, payable to his order, for $596.82, with interest at ten per cent.

The firm continued business until March 10, 1875, and was then dissolved, and by mutual consent the books and. accounts of the company were placed in the defendant, George W. Merrill’s hands, who collected the accounts and. paid the debts, and was thus engaged when this suit was-brought. There had been no settlement or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Learned v. AyresMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Spinning v. SullivanMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Portland Bank v. HydeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1834

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. LoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Carpenter v. GreenopMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Kalamazoo Trust Co. v. MerrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API