Markley v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TIMLIN, J.
In this matter we are called upon to decide whether the trial court may, in lieu of requiring a bond or undertaking as a condition of denying a motion to expunge lis pendens, authorize the plaintiff to execute and file a deed of trust on real property, to indemnify defendant for all damages proximately resulting from the denial of expungement, should defendant ultimately prevail in this action. We conclude that such an alternative is not authorized by statute and that the trial court exceeded its powers in making such an order. Accordingly, we issue the writ as prayed.
As we…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Ferguson v. KeaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Conover v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Burkes v. Robertson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Mix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Burkes v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Buzgheia v. Leasco Sierra GroveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Guzman v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.