Legal Opinion

People v. Rummel

California Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1966No. Crim. 9613PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

After the District Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, denied defendant’s motion to recall its re-mittitur and set aside the dismissal of his appeal from a judgment of guilty of the possession of marijuana, we granted a hearing. His appeal was dismissed by the District Court of Appeal for failure to file briefs. The dismissal of the appeal was entirely proper, and the matter will be treated as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

Facts: On February 21, 1964, defendant, while on parole, pleaded guilty in the Superior Court of San Diego County to possession of marijuana, admitting two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re McLainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. In re CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. In Re EtieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. MarquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. In Re SwearingenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. In Re TeranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. People v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API