Legal Opinion
In Re Etie
California Supreme Court
Decided March 19, 1946No. Crim. 4665PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The petitioner seeks his release from the State Prison at Folsom by this proceeding in habeas corpus. The writ was issued. The petition and the return show the following:
On June 9, 1938, in Los Angeles County, the petitioner pleaded guilty to a charge of violation of section 476a of the Penal Code (issuance of checks without sufficient funds with intent to defraud) and admitted a prior conviction of' a felony (forgery). He was committed to the State Prison at San Quentin. Subsequently the Board of Prison Terms and Paroles fixed his term of imprisonment at six years which, unless redetermined,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re BasuinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re KornerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- In Re KnaescheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- In Re HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- In Re SoldaviniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Zamudio)California Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re TartarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- In Re LawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- In Re McLainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.