Legal Opinion

Green Mountain Log Co. v. Columbia & Nehalem River Railroad

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is in the nature of an action for money had and received to recover certain alleged overcharges made by the defendant railroad company on shipments of logs by plaintiff which was engaged in logging operations in the lower Columbia river basin. The shipments were made between February 28, 1924, and June 1, 1925, and moved under tariff rate published by defendant railroad requiring the shipper to pay $3.25 per thousand feet of logs transported, “based on Spaulding scale.” Plaintiff asserts that the railroad company erroneously applied the tariff rate to these shipments and seeks to recover…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Conner v. Citizens' Street RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Champion v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Sauk River Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Glantz v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Central Radiator Co. v. Niagara Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. May v. Chicago Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Port Investment Co. v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Briggs v. Zia CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. In Re PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API