Legal Opinion
Radosti v. ENVISION EMI, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 19, 2011No. Civil Action 09-887 (CKK)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
The above-captioned case is a class action that arose out of a series of youth conferences sponsored by Defendant Envision EMI, LLC (“Envision”) in and around Washington, D.C. surrounding the inauguration of President Barack Obama in January 2009. The named plaintiffs in this action are Bina Radosti, Joshua Rottman, Sally Rife, Heather Kern, Zachary Johnson Burton, and Latiana Carter (collectively, the “named Plaintiffs”), who brought this action on behalf of themselves and a class of all those similarly situated alleging breach of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Trustees of the Hotel and Restaurant Employees Local 25 and Employers' Health and Welfare Fund v. Jpr, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Federal Trade Commission v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Radosti v. Envision Emi, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Cohen v. Warner Chilcott Public Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- Trombley v. National City BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Schultz v. Hungry MacHine, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- In Re Black Farmers Discrimination LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Quimby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.