Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Hungry MacHine, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 22, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-1697PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Eight named plaintiffs, 1 on behalf of a class of 10.9 million consumers, sued defendants LivingSocial, Inc. (“LivingSocial”) and Jack’s Canoes and Kayaks, LLC, d/b/a Jack’s Boathouse (“Jack’s Boathouse”) (collectively, “defendants”), alleging that defendants market and sell gift certificates, marked as “Deal Vouchers,” with limited expiration periods in violation of a variety of federal and state laws, including the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act (the “CARD Act”), Pub.L. No. 111-24, 123 Stat. 1734-1766…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Richardson v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Driscoll v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Keepseagle v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Greenberg v. ColvinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Kifafi v. Hilton Hotels Retirement PlanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.