Palmo v. S. W. Slayden & Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third District/ in an appeal from McLennan County. Palmo sued Slayden & Company and had judgment which, on defendant’s appeal was reversed and remanded. Appellee procured writ of error on the ground of conflicting decisions.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Associate Justice.
The following statement is sufficient for the solution of the questions presented upon this application:
Mi Palmo sued Slayden & Company upon a contract for the sale of certain lands, and, upon a trial before a jury, obtained a verdict for the sum of $9,508.35, and the judge of the trial court entered upon his docket the following: “11-13-03. Yerdict for plaintiff for $9,508.35.” The judge did not make any memorandum upon his docket, or otherwise, of. the judgment pronounced by him upon the verdict. The attorneys for the plaintiff in the case made a draft of a judgment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bassett v. MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Hill v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Jenks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Teas v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1855
- Henry v. BoulterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
3Cited by46 opinions
- Coalson v. HolmesTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MuseTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- Slayden v. PalmoTexas Supreme Court · 1917
- Peurifoy and Thomason v. WiebuschTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Aetna Ins. Co. v. DancerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.