Legal Opinion
Joseph Orlando v. Interstate Container Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 6, 1996No. 96-1085PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
In this labor relations case, the district court concluded that, in the absence of appropriate language in a collective bargaining agreement, an arbitration award in a grievance proceeding was not final. We agree and will affirm.
Plaintiff, a long-time employee of Interstate Container Corporation, underwent heart bypass surgery in 1992 and collected benefits for several months, as provided by a collective bargaining agreement. In January 1998, his application for a disability pension was approved by the Paper Industry Union-Management Fund. He also…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Arbitration Between Dow Corning Corporation v. Safety National Casualty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 91 of The International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Rowe v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- InterDigital Communications, Corp. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 91 v. United Technologies Corporation, Pratt & WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.