Legal Opinion
SIC v. Nunan
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 17, 2011No. AC 32196PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
In this action arising from a motor vehicle accident, the plaintiff, Marie E. Sic, appeals from the *694summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Michael E. Nunan. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly determined as a matter of law that the defendant did not owe her a legal duty of care. We agree with the plaintiff and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court.
On September 24, 2008, the plaintiff filed this negligence action seeking to recover damages for personal injuries that she sustained as a result of a motor…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brooks v. SweeneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- LePage v. HorneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Monk v. Temple George Associates, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Borsoi v. SparicoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- State v. CarterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- SIC v. NunanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Sic v. NunanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011