Legal Opinion

SIC v. Nunan

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 17, 2011No. AC 32196Published

1Opinion of the Court

18 A.3d 667 (2011)

128 Conn.App. 692

Marie E. SIC

v.

Michael E. NUNAN.

No. 32196.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Argued March 11, 2011.

Decided May 17, 2011.

M. Hatcher Norris, Hartford, with whom, on the brief, was J. Anthony Doran, Glastonbury, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Thomas A. Kyzivat, for the appellee (defendant).

BISHOP, ALVORD and BEAR, Js.

BISHOP, J.

In this action arising from a motor vehicle accident, the plaintiff, Marie E. Sic, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Michael E. Nunan. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Lodge v. Arett Sales Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Brooks v. SweeneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. LePage v. HorneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API