Legal Opinion
Smith v. Weeks
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 25, 1925PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
The bill was originally brought against the defendants Weeks and Wellington, as they are trustees under the will of Thomas Dana, and Julian Dana de Cordova, who gave to the plaintiff a partial assignment of the trust funds to which under the provisions of the will he had become entitled. But, de Cordova having died, Wellington was appointed special administrator of his estate, and having been duly authorized by the court of probate, he appeared to defend, and also filed a cross bill. The trustees demurred. The demurrer was overruled and they appealed. The presiding judge, after making certain…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- White v. GoveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Berman v. CoakleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Old Corner Book Store v. UphamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Delval v. GagnonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Security Bank of New York v. CallahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gill v. Richmond Co-operative Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Webster v. KellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Les v. AlibozekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Sherwin-Williams Co. v. J. Mannos & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Kagan v. Wattendorf & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.