Legal Opinion

KLASCH v. Walgreen Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 2011No. 54805PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Parraguirre, J.:

In this appeal, we consider the duty of care that a pharmacist owes his or her customers. Specifically, we are asked to clarify whether a pharmacist’s only duty is to fill a customer’s prescription with the correct medication and dosage or if, under certain circumstances, a pharmacist may have a duty to do more. We conclude that when a pharmacist has knowledge of a customer-specific risk with respect to a prescribed medication, the pharmacist has a duty to exercise reasonable care in warning the customer or notifying the prescribing doctor of this risk.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thom v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. Edwards v. Emperor's Garden RestaurantNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Wood v. Safeway, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Happel v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Sanchez Ex Rel. Sanchez v. Wal-MartNevada Supreme Court · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Foster v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. DeBoer v. Senior Bridges of Sparks Family Hospital, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Correa v. SchoeckMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  4. Holcomb v. Georgia Pacific, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Kwasniewski Ex Rel. Estate of Kwasniewski v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API