Legal Opinion

Correa v. Schoeck

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 7, 2018No. SJC 12409PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.

**687In this case, we address the novel issue whether a pharmacy has a legal duty to notify a prescribing physician when a patient's health insurer informs the pharmacy that it requires a "prior authorization"

*194form3 from the physician. Health insurers often require prescribing physicians to submit prior authorization forms to establish that prescriptions for particular medications are medically necessary and cost-effective. Since it is the pharmacy that submits the claim for reimbursement, however, only the pharmacy, and not the physician or the patient, is notified when a prescribing…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Jupin v. KaskMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. Happel v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Hashimi v. KalilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. McKee v. American Home Products Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Carrozza v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  2. Donis v. American Waste Services, LLCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
  3. Charles Fuller, Octavia Adams, John Shelton, and Elizabeth Ocejo, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated individuals v. Sefas Innovation, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2026
  4. DOLORES M. BROWN, Individually and as Personal Representative v. SAINT VINCENT RADIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2024
  5. GGNSC Administrative Services, LLC v. SchraderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API