Legal Opinion
Troutman v. FMC Corp.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided October 26, 1983No. 83-374PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
A roofing subcontractor, Rob Troutman, appeals from several rulings of the trial court which effectively dismissed FMC Corporation, the owner of the building in question, as a party to the action. At the base of this action is an attempt by Troutman to recover the contract price of $37,200 for work done on FMC’s roof by lien foreclosure. Although Troutman’s notice to FMC was defective, no determination was made by the trial court, pursuant to sec. 779.02(2) (e), Stats., as to whether the insufficiency of the notice misled or deceived FMC. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s decision and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Heck & Paetow Claim Service, Inc. v. HeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Department of Natural Resources v. Wisconsin Power & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Sullivan Bros. v. State Bank of Union GroveCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
- Leciejewski v. SedlakCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
- Automatic Merchandising Corp. v. NusbaumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bob Ryan Leasing v. SampairCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- McQuay-Perfex, Inc. v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- Murphy v. DroesslerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- Kox v. Center for Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, S.C.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998