Legal Opinion

Southern Ice & Utilities Co. v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 21, 1933No. 1104PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

• HICKMAN,.Chief Justice.

The appeal is from a judgment in favor of appellees Mrs. Myrtle Richardson and husband, E. Richardson, against appellant Southern Ice & Utilities Company for $1,250 damages for personal injuries sustained by Mrs. Richardson in an automobile accident on the Bankhead highway between the towns of Eastland and Ranger. The case is briefed under seventeen propositions or points, and they will be considered in their order.

The first point is, in substance, that a request for peremptory instruction in appellant’s favor made at the conclusion of the testimony should have been…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jones v. GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. West Texas Coaches, Inc. v. MadiTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  3. Rio Grande, E. P. & S. F. R. v. DupreeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Hewitt v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. San Antonio Street Railway Co. v. HelmTexas Supreme Court · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Fambrough v. WagleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Southland Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. CottenTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Southern Ice & Utilities Co. v. RichardsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1936
  4. Southern Ice & Utilities Co. v. RichardsonTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API