Legal Opinion
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Sallak
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 27, 1996No. 93C10229; CA A87069PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm) brought this declaratory judgment action to establish that it had no obligation to defend or to indemnity its insured, Sallak, in a personal injury action commenced by appellant, Sherburn. The trial court granted State Farm’s motion for summary judgment and entered a declaratory judgment. Because there is no dispute about the facts, we review to determine whether summary judgment is appropriate as a matter of law, ORCP 47 C, and affirm.
On July 8, 1990, Marion County Sheriffs Officer Sherburn went to the scene of a domestic disturbance at the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. NiziolekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReuterOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Merchants Mutual Insurance v. ArzilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- James v. PaulSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- Thomas Dodd Doris Dodd v. Hood River County, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Tradewind Ins. Co., Ltd. v. StoutHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
- Allen v. MartinColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.