Legal Opinion
United States v. Eric Wendlandt
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 19, 2013No. 11-2018PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Eric Wendlandt appeals his above-Guidelines sentence of forty-two months of imprisonment imposed after he pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. His conviction stems from a mortgage fraud scheme that caused the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) to insure loans for unqualified applicants based upon forged documents and false information provided by Wendlandt. The substantial financial losses to HUD that ensued were, of course, inevitable.
On appeal, Wendlandt contends…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. WarshakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. James F. MooredCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Samuel F. CollingtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Duane G. Willis and Mary J. WillisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Tirrell ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. George R. CavalloCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Jerry KerleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Michael Winans, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Oghenevwakpo IgbobaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.