Legal Opinion

United States v. Tirrell Thomas

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 6, 2019No. 18-1592PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

*607 This case spotlights the hazards for defendants when they do not tell the truth to the probation officers who prepare their presentence reports for sentencing. After pleading guilty to bank fraud, Tirrell Thomas needed only to accept responsibility for his actions (and not obfuscate) to obtain a guidelines range between 46 and 57 months' imprisonment. Yet Thomas lied about his involvement in the fraud to the probation officer working on his presentence report. So, when calculating his guidelines range, the court rejected an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction and…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. Jennifer RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. United States v. Eduardo Perez-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Tramain HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Daniel TrevinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  5. United States v. Manuel Estrada-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API