People v. Vasila
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
Defendant was convicted of possession and cultivation of marijuana and possession of illegal firearms. He argues the guns were recovered as fruit of a coerced confession and, thus, should have been suppressed. We agree and reverse the firearms convictions.
Statement of Facts
Based upon information from defendant’s estranged wife, Sheriff’s Detective Smiley obtained a warrant to search for illegal guns at defendant’s 200-acre farm. At approximately 8 a.m. on October 4, 1992, Smiley arrested defendant in downtown Bloomfield, informed him of his Miranda rights, and took him back…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. BeardsleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. TullyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. McWhorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. DowdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. C.S.A.California Court of Appeal · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.