Legal Opinion

People v. Vasila

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1995No. A065897PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

Defendant was convicted of possession and cultivation of marijuana and possession of illegal firearms. He argues the guns were recovered as fruit of a coerced confession and, thus, should have been suppressed. We agree and reverse the firearms convictions.

Statement of Facts

Based upon information from defendant’s estranged wife, Sheriff’s Detective Smiley obtained a warrant to search for illegal guns at defendant’s 200-acre farm. At approximately 8 a.m. on October 4, 1992, Smiley arrested defendant in downtown Bloomfield, informed him of his Miranda rights, and took him back…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. BeardsleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. TullyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. McWhorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. People v. DowdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. People v. C.S.A.California Court of Appeal · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API