Legal Opinion
State v. Rado
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 3, 1988No. 5387PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of three counts of bribe receiving in violation of General Statutes § 53a-148 (a).1 The defendant challenges the constitutionality of the investigating grand juror and argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss filed on the basis of insufficient evidence and in denying him access to the grand juror transcripts.
The jury could reasonably have found the following facts. The defendant, a former mayor of Naugatuck, on three occasions manipulated the process by which municipal construction contracts…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. PiersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. VaughnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- State v. SteinmannConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Skinner v. AnglikerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Rado v. MeachumDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.