Legal Opinion
State v. Steinmann
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 30, 1990No. 7665PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The defendant appeals his convictions, after a trial to the court, of simple trespass in viola*601tion of General Statutes § 53a-110a. He claims the trial court erred (1) in finding that there was sufficient evidence for conviction, (2) in failing to find the simple trespass statute to be unconstitutional, and (3) in failing to find that the state’s decision not to prosecute for criminal trespass deprived the defendant of his equal protection rights.
The court could reasonably have found the following facts. A conflict arose in the spring of 1987 between the defendant, John Steinmann, and the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. WhistnantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Cologne v. Westfarms AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Olsen v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. AnthonyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- State v. MazzettaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- State v. OngConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.