Legal Opinion
Rado v. Meachum
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 18, 1988No. Civ. N-88-479 (PCD)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR STAY OF STATE SENTENCE
DORSEY, District Judge.
Mr. Rado petitions for a writ of habeas corpus seeking collateral review of his conviction on three counts of bribe receiving in the Superior Court of the State of Connecticut. 28 U.S.C. § 2241, et seq. He now moves for a stay of execution of his sentence pending resolution of his petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2251.
Facts
Petitioner was sentenced to concurrent two year sentences plus a $3000 fine. His appeal to the Connecticut Appellate Court was denied. State v. Rado, 14 Conn.App. 322, 541 A.2d 124 (1988). His motion for reargument in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Francis T. Glynn v. Robert Donnelly, John M. Farrell v. Robert DonnellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- Iuteri v. NardozaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- State v. RadoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Stepney v. LopesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
- Rado v. MansonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Leslie v. HolderDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Richard v. AbramsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Harrison v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2022
- Larell Campbell v. Superintendent, Yaphank Correctional Facility, and Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026
- St. John v. North CarolinaDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1990