State v. McCarthy
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.
The basic question presented is whether a wife, by virtue of her status as a joint resident of premises with her husband, may give valid consent to a warrantless search thereof by the police.
At the outset, it should be noted that we harbor doubts as to whether the police activity at appellant’s residence on January 2, 1967, was a “search and seizure” within the contemplation of the Fourth Amendment. It has been stated that a search ordinarily implies a quest by an officer of the law, a prying into hidden places for that *90which is concealed; and that a seizure connotes a forcible dispossession…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- In re LessardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. LindwayOhio Supreme Court · 1936
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. BartramTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Silva v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- State v. ScottOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.